The "yield-starved" hypothesis is very good. Wall Street endlessly creates synthetic vehicles, either for sale or for themselves, and the vehicles are always fragile. They want them to be buffered long enough to generate returns. This is similar to what they're doing with those crackpot social development bonds.
The "yield-starved" hypothesis is very good. Wall Street endlessly creates synthetic vehicles, either for sale or for themselves, and the vehicles are always fragile. They want them to be buffered long enough to generate returns. This is similar to what they're doing with those crackpot social development bonds.
The "yield-starved" hypothesis is very good. Wall Street endlessly creates synthetic vehicles, either for sale or for themselves, and the vehicles are always fragile. They want them to be buffered long enough to generate returns. This is similar to what they're doing with those crackpot social development bonds.
Exactly. Carbon credits is basically a rent-extraction scheme. Green-washing.